认识的一位技术人员告诉我用 0-a 替换-a，可以提升性能，我将信将疑，写了小代码测试一下

int main() {     int a = 100;      auto a1 = -a;     auto a2 = 0-a;      return 0; } 

然后看看 LLVM 的中间码

%6:gr32 = SUB32rm %0:gr32(tied-def 0), %stack.1, 1, $noreg, 0, $noreg, implicit-def $eflags, debug-location !19 :: (load 4 from %ir.2); ./test.cpp:5:15   MOV32mr %stack.2, 1, $noreg, 0, $noreg, killed %6:gr32, debug-location !17 :: (store 4 into %ir.3); ./test.cpp:5:10    %3:gr32 = SUB32rm %0:gr32(tied-def 0), %stack.1, 1, $noreg, 0, $noreg, implicit-def $eflags, debug-location !23 :: (load 4 from %ir.2); ./test.cpp:6:16   MOV32mr %stack.3, 1, $noreg, 0, $noreg, killed %3:gr32, debug-location !21 :: (store 4 into %ir.4); ./test.cpp:6:10 

是完全一样的

再试试如果 a 是 double 呢？

int main() {     double a = 100;      auto a1 = -a;     auto a2 = 0-a;      return 0; } 

出现了明显不同：

  %11:fr64 = MOVSDrm_alt %stack.1, 1, $noreg, 0, $noreg, debug-location !19 :: (load 8 from %ir.2); ./test.cpp:5:16   %7:gr64 = MOVSDto64rr killed %11:fr64, debug-location !20; ./test.cpp:5:15   %8:gr64 = MOV64ri -9223372036854775808, debug-location !20; ./test.cpp:5:15   %9:gr64 = XOR64rr killed %7:gr64(tied-def 0), %8:gr64, implicit-def $eflags, debug-location !20; ./test.cpp:5:15   %10:fr64 = MOV64toSDrr killed %9:gr64, debug-location !20; ./test.cpp:5:15   MOVSDmr %stack.2, 1, $noreg, 0, $noreg, killed %10:fr64, debug-location !18 :: (store 8 into %ir.3); ./test.cpp:5:10    %2:fr64 = FsFLD0SD debug-location !24; ./test.cpp:6:16   %4:fr64 = SUBSDrm %2:fr64(tied-def 0), %stack.1, 1, $noreg, 0, $noreg, debug-location !24 :: (load 8 from %ir.2); ./test.cpp:6:16   MOVSDmr %stack.3, 1, $noreg, 0, $noreg, killed %4:fr64, debug-location !22 :: (store 8 into %ir.4); ./test.cpp:6:10   $eax = COPY %0:gr32, debug-location !25; ./test.cpp:8:5 

上面的代码都是用-O0测试的，打开优化的话就测试不出了，两行代码直接被优化掉了

所以在某些情况下确实 0-a 比-a 少几条指令，所以会快一些？