suwubee 大佬有话说 :
contabo的美国确实还可以啊
本帖最后由 suwubee 于 2020-4-8 18:01 编辑
下单，付款，到开通差不多25分钟。不知道为啥这个测速只跑国内节点？
Superbench.sh — https://www.oldking.net/350.html
Mode: Standard Version : 1.1.6
Usage : wget -qO- git.io/superbench.sh | bash
Fixed bugs version usage : wget -qO- msoayu56.com/files/speedtest/superbench.sh | bash
Fixed version 2
———————————————————————-
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz
CPU Cores : 4 Cores 2199.998 MHz x86_64
CPU Cache : 16384 KB
OS : CentOS 7.7.1908 (64 Bit) KVM
Kernel : 3.10.0-1062.el7.x86_64
Total Space : 1.5 GB / 196.9 GB
Total RAM : 115 MB / 7821 MB (81 MB Buff)
Total SWAP : 0 MB / 0 MB
Uptime : 0 days 1 hour 19 min
Load Average : 0.01, 0.03, 0.04
TCP CC : cubic
ASN & ISP : AS40021, Contabo Inc.
Organization : Contabo Inc
Location : St Louis, United States / US
Region : Missouri
———————————————————————-
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 102 MB/s
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 107 MB/s
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 107 MB/s
Average I/O Speed : 105.3 MB/s
———————————————————————-
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 169.19 Mbit/s 193.77 Mbit/s 25.99 ms
Fast.com 0.00 Mbit/s 154.9 Mbit/s –
Beijing 5G CT1.60 Mbit/s 42.31 Mbit/s –
Nanjing 5G CT1.41 Mbit/s 31.11 Mbit/s –
Hefei 5G CT1.52 Mbit/s 72.70 Mbit/s –
Guangzhou 5G CT2.63 Mbit/s 14.77 Mbit/s –
TianJin 5G CU2.81 Mbit/s 19.14 Mbit/s –
Shanghai 5GCU2.61 Mbit/s 20.94 Mbit/s –
Guangzhou 5G CU2.78 Mbit/s 8.08 Mbit/s –
Tianjin 5G CM0.25 Mbit/s 0.76 Mbit/s –
Wuxi 5G CM0.35 Mbit/s 1.19 Mbit/s –
Nanjing 5G CM0.54 Mbit/s 18.00 Mbit/s –
Changsha 5GCM0.22 Mbit/s 1.10 Mbit/s –
———————————————————————-
Finished in: 8 min 40 sec
Timestamp : 2020-04-08 16:43:56 GMT+8
Results : /root/superbench.log
———————————————————————-
Share result:
· http://www.speedtest.net/result/9253459842.png
· https://paste.ubuntu.com./p/d3768Hjxfs/
国外测速，注意这个是MB，没跑完，ssh超时了
———————————————————————
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz
Number of cores : 4
CPU frequency : 2199.998 MHz
Total size of Disk : 196.9 GB (1.6 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem: 7821 MB (125 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 2 hour 32 min
Load average : 0.40, 5.54, 5.00
OS : CentOS 7.7.1908
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 3.10.0-1062.el7.x86_64
———————————————————————-
I/O speed(1st run) : 127 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run) : 107 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run) : 107 MB/s
Average I/O speed : 113.7 MB/s
———————————————————————-
Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed
CacheFly 205.234.175.175 23.7MB/s
Linode, Tokyo2, JP 139.162.65.37 7.88MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 4.60MB/s
Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 7.39MB/s
Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 9.45MB/s
Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 18.1MB/s
Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 2.67MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 5.38MB/s
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: vmixxxxxxxxxx: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 3.10.0-1062.el7.x86_64 — #1 SMP Wed Aug 7 18:08:02 UTC 2019
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz (4400.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz (4400.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz (4400.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz (4400.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
10:47:55 up1:32,2 users,load average: 0.14, 0.07, 0.08; runlevel 3
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Wed Apr 08 2020 10:47:55 – 11:15:57
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 28242559.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4350.5 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1874.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 418284.1 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 108629.1 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1232552.8 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 543994.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 35141.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5963.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4808.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1674.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 419187.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 28242559.5 2420.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4350.5 791.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 1874.1 435.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 418284.1 1056.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 108629.1 656.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1232552.8 2125.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 543994.0 437.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 35141.2 87.9
Process Creation 126.0 5963.7 473.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4808.8 1134.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1674.2 2790.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 419187.2 279.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 721.1
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Wed Apr 08 2020 11:15:57 – 11:44:04
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 112043904.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 17065.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7582.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 538855.7 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 145855.6 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1536957.2 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2067725.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 372383.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 23005.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 12716.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1833.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1455489.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0112043904.6 9601.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 17065.2 3102.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 7582.8 1763.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 538855.7 1360.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 145855.6 881.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1536957.2 2649.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2067725.8 1662.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 372383.1 931.0
Process Creation 126.0 23005.7 1825.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 12716.2 2999.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1833.0 3055.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1455489.3 970.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2003.9
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
ccf 大佬有话说 :
看结果很垃圾啊…
掩耳盗铃 大佬有话说 :
亲亲对好的概念有什么误解吗？:lol:lol
net666 大佬有话说 :
亲亲对好的概念有什么误解吗？:lol:lol
h20 大佬有话说 :
怎么MJJ这么有钱呢，我要反思一下
一个不知名网友 大佬有话说 :
亲亲对好的概念有什么误解吗？:lol:lol
suwubee 大佬有话说 :
掩耳盗铃 大佬有话说 : 2020-4-8 16:47
亲亲对好的概念有什么误解吗？
配置高，价格低。网络是自己的问题:lol
桜です 大佬有话说 :
亲亲对好的概念有什么误解吗？:lol:lol
treesky 大佬有话说 :
:lol硬件可能是从堪萨斯进货的
伊斯蓝 大佬有话说 :
亲亲对好的概念有什么误解吗？
明明还不如德国机房呢
suwubee 大佬有话说 :
伊斯蓝 大佬有话说 : 2020-4-8 16:50
亲亲对好的概念有什么误解吗？
明明还不如德国机房呢
:lol6欧好像在米国找不到这种配置的，欧洲的话倒是便宜的很多。